WHEN MUSIC POPS, WE TURN IT UP

Kim Kardashian won’t film herself giving birth

Kim Kardashian won’t film herself giving birth
Kim Kardashian

Ever since Kim Kardashian first announced that she was pregnant with The Destroyer, she’s stuck to her guns that she wouldn’t turn her child’s birth in a big, attention-whorin’ media blitz, ironically while turning her pregnancy into the biggest, cash-grabbingest media blitz ever for a pregnancy. Seriously, she’s given more interviews about her pregnancy in the past two weeks than most celebs give in the full nine months. So here she is once again talking to MTV about how she’s not going to film her baby’s birth, as if that were some kind of accomplishment and we should give her a medal for the most basic of human decency:

Kardashian is just three months pregnant with her first child with boyfriend Kanye West, and while Ryan Seacrest did admit that viewers will see Kim’s pregnancy on the upcoming season of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, when the baby is due in July, cameras will be off. “I’m going to keep that private,” Kardashian told MTV News of whether she will be filming the birth of her child. This may come as a surprise to some who are used to seeing monumental moments in the Kardashians’ lives. Kourtney Kardashian famously televised the births of both of her children, Mason and Penelope, and her two children will be featured regularly on the upcoming season of Kourtney & Kim Take Miami. However, if you’re expecting to see baby Kimye joining in on playtime with her cousins while cameras are rolling, think again, because Kim admits that she is “going to keep that private too.”

Let’s consider something here: Single mothers and gays have to wait months, if not years just to adopt a baby, and Kim can get knocked up by accident and ride that pony to money and infamy. Also, who are we kidding here? I bet if E! slipped her a check made out to cash, she’d probably let them install a live-feed directly in her uterus.

Kim Kardashian