CULKIN AINT GAY
» this comment was posted by Wowthere on october 12, 2004 10:11 pm «
» this comment was posted by Emily on october 13, 2004 8:51 am «
» this comment was posted by trusty on october 13, 2004 9:28 am «
» this comment was posted by FernLaPlante on october 13, 2004 1:47 pm «
» this comment was posted by USAorbust on october 14, 2004 10:55 am «
» this comment was posted by shannon on october 23, 2004 10:55 am «
» this comment was posted by Samantha on october 28, 2004 11:17 pm «
» this comment was posted by Gay on february 23, 2005 10:53 am «
» this comment was posted by Jenny on april 9, 2005 4:08 pm «
» this comment was posted by Emi on may 27, 2005 7:07 am «
» this comment was posted by lauren on may 28, 2005 4:36 pm «
» this comment was posted by brittany on july 8, 2005 7:24 am «
» this comment was posted by barbie_girl on july 11, 2005 9:22 am «
» this comment was posted by GIAN on october 13, 2005 10:35 am «
» this comment was posted by Alexander on december 4, 2005 9:21 am «
» this comment was posted by Michael Ginn on january 8, 2006 8:23 pm «
» this comment was posted by ivan on may 7, 2006 6:31 pm «
» this comment was posted by kenken on june 11, 2006 1:22 am «
So all it takes is a lawyer's letter to pull a story? That letter only proves the merit of the original leak. It MUST have been true then.
By pulling it off your site either shows a lack of compassion of your site to the truth or a lack of professional journalism here.